Hot air?
Today David Miliband announced the UK’s new climate change bill, getting the message across with this video on YouTube. Climate change has become a matter of increasingly concern, especially after last month’s report that global warming could involve a rise in temperatures of around 4 degrees by the end of the century, with chaotic consequences. The Royal Society has been involved with the investigation into climate change: a study launched in January will focus in particular on the effects of ground-level ozone, one of the greenhouse gasses likely to influence warming.
Although most of the opposition to the view that human activity is responsible for climate change has now dissipated, studying the interaction between the properties of the air and the weather has long been hotly debated. In the seventeenth century the concept of air having a changeable gaseous nature rather than representing a static element was a new and controversial idea. The existence of so
me exhaustible property of air could be proven by Robert Hooke’s experiments with the now familiar experiment using a candle flame inside a jar. He repeated this using a chick and then himself, who fortunately both remained ‘very lively’. The possibilities afforded by this new understanding of air were also demonstrated in Boyle’s famous airpump, described in his New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall, Touching the Spring of the Air and its Effects.
Not everyone was convinced immediately: Thomas Hobbes was famously critical of the credibility of Boyle’s experimental proofs. Many also doubted the validity of the experiments that the Royal Society performed to test air pressure using barometers and to compare the weights of various substances in air and water.
A page of the Hooke folio that does not seem to have survived elsewhere, probably dating from 1678, defends the various experiments against an attack on them as ‘triuiall and impertinent tricks’ by those who think themselves ‘masters of all knowledge a priori and by Reuelation and dispise[d] such as is acquired by experimental inquiry’. He goes on to argue that, concerning air:
An exact and thorough knowledge of that is of more concerne
to mankind then all the other physicall knowledg in the world. for
it is by that we continually subsist & wthout it we cannot liue one
tenth part of an hower. tis from that proceeds the causes of Infi=
nite of Diseases, and It affordes as many Remedys for those Distem
pers…that is the cause sine
qua non of all vegetables and animalls vpon the Land and it Influences euen
the fish in the sea. Infinite and vnspeakable are the vses of it to the husband
man the merchant the tradesman the mechanick &c and that age will be
Deseruedly famous that perfects the theory of it.
Hooke’s argument apparently gained acceptance among the Royal Society, who continued to investigate the properties of the air and their effects on the atmosphere. As a recent article in Amix notes, Nehemiah Grew came up with an interesting if incorrect theory that attributed barometric variations to the changing concentrations of saline bodies in the air, that affected atmospheric pressure. By the time of the Great Trigonometrical survey in India, observers were directed to record the chemical composition of the air.
Despite the innovations of John Evelyn in predicting the consequences of man’s interference with the environment in his discourse on forest trees, the impact of man on the composition of the air would only become significant after the industrial revolution and not fully appreciated until long after that. Furthermore, the age which Hooke envisages in which the understanding of the air and our interaction with it is perfected still seems far distant.
Comments :1


